Levitan's Solo Pod: The $100k Buy-In Fantasy Football League, Week 2 Results, Listener Questions (Episode 1024)
Adam Levitan reviews his week 2 DFS cash and tournament results, crediting outlier performances from Dalton Schultz and Panthers defense for a big cash week, while explaining how fading Bijan Robinson and stacking expensive receivers was the real tournament edge. He also riffs on the $100k buy-in best ball league, the value of whale action in high-stakes gambling, and answers several listener questions.
This is a solo recap episode where Adam Levitan reviews his own Week 2 DFS results, breaks down the tournament-winning plays from Week 2, and fields listener questions ranging from the $100K buy-in best ball league to bathroom etiquette. The through-line: Levitan is unusually candid about how much of his cash success was variance rather than skill, and he uses that as a springboard to talk about where real edge exists in DFS and in high-stakes peer-to-peer gambling generally.
The arguments
Levitan's Week 2 cash win was mostly luck, not skill, and he says so explicitly. He built cash lineups around Dalton Schultz (12-140, 29 DK points) and Panthers defense (five turnovers, a defensive TD, three sacks, 26 DK points), calling both roughly 97th-99th percentile outcomes he didn't actually see coming. He admits several real mistakes elsewhere — playing Bijan Robinson over Christian McCaffrey, rostering DK Metcalf at 5,200 against the Patriots with declining Aaron Rodgers, and not prioritizing CeeDee Lamb at 7,300 against Washington — and says none of that mattered because the tight end and defense outcomes were so extreme.
The real Week 2 tournament edge was fading Bijan Robinson and paying up at wide receiver. Levitan says his tournament thesis was built on avoiding Bijan (Atlanta's offense too inept to generate a ceiling outside garbage-time checkdowns and low-percentage runs) while rostering expensive receivers who dominated the slate — Jaxon Smith-Njigba (41 FanDuel points, most on the slate), Lamb (34), Devonta Smith (25.7), and Ja'Marr Chase (23). He draws a distinction between Bijan's situation and running backs stuck with genuinely bad-but-willing-to-checkdown quarterbacks (Cooper Rush, Kirk Cousins types), noting Malik Willis specifically does not feed his backfield the same way.
Levitan is leaning on DFS simulation tools (via Solver) to construct tournament lineups rather than picking spots manually. He described locking stacks he liked (Baker Mayfield–Emeka Egbuka, McCaffrey, a Parker Washington/Jaxon Waddle mini-correlation), boosting/docking leans, then generating 500 lineups optimized for ceiling and checking cash rate and finish distributions. His best FanDuel build using this process didn't cash because Mayfield was terrible, but he still defends the process.
A team member's $50,000 GPP win illustrates how to combine chalk with cheap leverage. Nate built around a heavily-owned Dak Prescott–George Pickens stack plus chalky Derrick Henry, Aaron Jones, and Schultz, but included lightly-owned Jaxon Smith-Njigba (8%) and Panthers defense (6%) — enough differentiation to win despite an otherwise consensus roster.
Whales in nosebleed-stakes leagues aren't fools even when their draft decisions look bad, and mid-stakes is actually the worst place to compete. Reacting to the mocking of the $100K buy-in best ball draft board (Cam Ward going ahead of Jalen Hurts and Jordan Love), Levitan argues wealthy amateurs playing for fun rather than EV are rational — they've already won in life and don't need to optimize target-share estimates. He contrasts this with the "grinder" middle tier (5-10, 10-20 stakes, 10-9s, 50/50s) where he says ROI is actually toughest, unlike either the softest low-stakes games or the profitable nosebleed-stakes pools where pros get good action against whales having fun.
ETR will not ship a custom-scoring rankings tool, betting picks product, or advanced tracking-data rankings unless they meet an internal quality bar. Responding to a listener request for league-specific customized rankings, Levitan says it's a redraft-season priority for next year but won't be promised, citing the same standard that's kept ETR from releasing a full best-ball season simulator or advanced separation/man-zone data products — he argues those metrics look good on Twitter but aren't predictive.
What it means for your roster
- Fade Bijan Robinson in GPPs while he's still fine as a cash-game floor play; the offensive environment caps his ceiling to garbage-time work.
- Pay up for expensive WRs in tournaments — Lamb, JSN, Devonta Smith, and Chase were the actual Week 2 ceiling plays, reinforcing a "spend at receiver" tournament approach going forward.
- Don't chase Dalton Schultz or Panthers DST expecting repeat production — Levitan flags both as extreme outlier outcomes (97th-99th percentile), not sustainable weekly plays.
- Build lower-owned correlation pieces around chalk stacks in GPPs, following Nate's model: a heavily-owned QB-WR stack plus one or two sub-10%-owned skill players/defenses can be enough differentiation to win a large-field tournament.
- If you're using DFS optimizer/sim tools, lock your core stack and leans, then generate high lineup volume weighted to ceiling rather than hand-picking every roster spot.
- Don't expect ETR's rankings tool to support custom league scoring settings this season — plan to manually adjust existing rankings for non-standard formats until (if) that product ships.
“The whales are almost always the actual winners in life.” — Adam Levitan
Players in this episode
↓ Played him in cash for the floor, but faded him in tournaments because his week 1 production relied on garbage-time checkdowns and an inept offense, capping his ceiling.
↑ Scored 23 FanDuel points, another top performer supporting the expensive-WR tournament strategy.
↑ Wanted to pivot to McCaffrey over Bijan in tournaments as part of his preferred build; admitted starting Bijan-type value over him in cash may have been a mistake.
↑ Posted 41 FanDuel points, the most of any position on the slate, validating the fade-Bijan/pay-up-at-WR tournament strategy.
↑ Scored 34 FanDuel points (second-most on the slate); Levitan regrets not prioritizing him at 7,300 against the Commanders in cash.
→ Was out for the Bengals game, which opened up target volume that Dalton Schultz capitalized on.
↑ Should have gone ahead of Cam Ward in the $100k league draft based on any reasonable ranking system.
↑ Put up 25.7 FanDuel points, third-most among skill players, reinforcing the pay-up-WR tournament thesis.
→ Part of Levitan's locked tournament stack with Baker Mayfield, which did not pay off.
→ Was one of the QB stacks Levitan wanted to build around in tournament lineups.
↑ Also should have been drafted ahead of Cam Ward; was part of Levitan's own preferred tournament QB stacks.
↓ Started at 5,200 against the Patriots in cash; Levitan called this a mistake in hindsight.
↓ Was locked into a stack with Emeka Egbuka for tournaments on FanDuel, but the stack failed because Mayfield performed poorly.
↑ Went off for 12 catches, 140 yards and 29 DraftKings points against the Bengals despite Nico Collins being out, a 97th-99th percentile cash-game outcome.
↓ Was drafted before Jalen Hurts and Jordan Love in a $100k buy-in best ball league, a decision Levitan says can't be justified by any ranking or projection methodology.
↓ Unlike other bad quarterbacks (Cooper Rush, Kirk Cousins), Willis isn't expected to check down heavily to his running back, limiting that RB's floor/ceiling.
↓ Called 'such toast' — starting him alongside Metcalf was viewed as a mistake.
→ Included among the tournament QB stacks Levitan wanted exposure to.